Question about CPUs and Virtualization

Are threads the most important thing in CPUs for virtualizing a dedicated server or is there something as essential I have to look out for? Thanks.


Similar Content



Does server virtualization (Virtuozzo) impact server performance?

I'm currently designing a new server architecture in colab with a server tech, we'll need 4 dedicated servers and he has recommended to setup server virtualization via Virtuozzo, his reasoning is that it will make it easy to migrate to better hardware when needed. This seems like a good idea but some devs are telling my that it will degrade the performance of the boxes is this true? His plan is to install OS on 2 x SATA(Raid 1) drives and then place the virtualization on 2 x SSD's (Raid 1)
I would like a 2nd opinion on this,
Does the virtualization degrade performance, IF it does then by how much? Is it really this convenient to use such a virtualization setup in reference to migration? Any other thing to consider?

Thanks!

Are servers with Ryzen CPUs stable enough?

Hello,

I know that servers with EPYC CPUs are very reliable, but are Ryzen servers reliable enough? I've seen there're many Ryzen servers on sale on Hetzner. If I rent a Ryzen server, do I need to reboot it every some days? Thanks a lot.

Looking for some suggestions regarding CPU selection

I am planning to upgrade my current, very old server (Dual E5-2430 Xeons, 12 cores/24 HT with SATA SSDs) which has been doing duty as a shared hosting server for around 400 websites. Have noticed slow website loading times. 95% sites are using PHP/MySQL(Wordpress).

From the time I got the server and now, so many new CPUs have come out and looks like the xeon e3/e5 lines have been discontinued. Dual scalable silver/gold xeon servers are out of my budget, so the only alternative is a E-2288G or a W-1290P (more interested in this one) xeon with NVMe drives. Passmark scores for these servers are much higher than my current one, but moving to these new servers will mean a downgrade in the number of cores.

Looking for some personal experiences with these E-2288G/W-1290P CPUs, so that I am not actually getting a downgrade by changing servers.

I don't need more than 64GB of RAM and a 2x2TB NVMe SSD is fine.

Intel Xeon Gold CPUs

Hello,
Do you know this Intel Xeon Gold processor?
We recently received a request for quote a dedicated cloud server with this CPU
but it seems that they are not available in Amazon EC2, so I was wondering if they are available elsewhere

Need Help with choosing a dedicated server

I'm seriously considering making a VPS service for sneaker bots. What's the most important thing to look out for when choosing a dedicated server for such a service? Are CPU cores the most important thing for efficiency or is it the RAM or what exactly? Thanks

Can i combine several servers into on server?

Hello, if there is a 10 server just a 1U server with two 2 E5 CPUs, can i combine all of this 10 server and build one server so that i can install and use the system on 10 servers together? Is it possibe?

Best Dedicated Server Conditions

Hello, my name is David, new member

I'm recently learning about using server hosting or providing services.
And I realized that server hosting should also be provided to meet customer needs.

Below are the Top 5 picked from our own survey to learn more.
Server's stable operation, security, price, quick response, and data center location seem to be important values.
What do you think is most important in a dedicated server??

Please feel free to share your opinions and reasons. I would appreciate it

Official WHT Server Benchmark (with UnixBench 5.1.2)

Please do not post your results if you use old Unixbench 4.x version. This thread is only for UnixBench 5.1.2, the latest UnixBench version, one that is SMP aware.

The old server benchmark thread in WHT is filled with non-sense results, most, if not all 136 pages of them. Part of the reason is, I believe, the version 4 of UnixBench is not meant to be used on the multiple CPUs/cores environment, pretty much standard on today's servers.

The old Unixbench 4.1-WHT variants produce poor results, especially on Xen environment.

Please do not post any further on that old thread. Do not contribute to further confusion caused by that. IMHO, most, if not all, results on that thread should be discarded.

This thread is meant to be the replacement. Please only post your test using UnixBench 5.1.2. I am posting the original un-modified version. Let's keep this original version in tact.

Simply execute the following command:

tar -zxvf unixbench-5.1.2.tar.gz
cd unixbench-5.1.2
make
./Run

or, if you want to disable file-copy tests, execute the following command (instead of ./Run):

./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16

Please also note that this 5.1.2 version will make two runs. One run will test only 1 core (1 parallel copy). Another run will test all the available cores (e.g., 16 parallel copies for 8 CPUs with HT).

I am going to post the first "official" result.

Server: Dell PowerEdge R510, Dual E5520 (HyperThreading/Logical CPU DISABLED), 32 GB ECC DDR3 REG,

Code:
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

   System: localhost.localdomain: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-164.el5PAE -- #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 04:10:44 EDT 2009
   Machine: i686 (i386)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.7 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.6 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   09:59:33 up  3:15,  2 users,  load average: 0.10, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Feb 05 2010 09:59:33 - 10:22:49
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       11021090.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2283.3 MWIPS (6.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1826.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              672125.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  81365.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               8635.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   4118.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)                  1180.4 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2002.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        2805654.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Partial Index              BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   11021090.5    944.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2283.3    415.1
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1826.8    424.8
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     672125.5    540.3
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      81365.5    203.4
Process Creation                                126.0       8635.2    685.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4118.9    971.4
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)                     ---       1180.4      ---
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2002.9   3338.2
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2805654.3   1870.4
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)                          751.1

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Feb 05 2010 10:22:49 - 10:46:14
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       87401364.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    17524.5 MWIPS (7.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              22554.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             5382685.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                1849908.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              86373.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  23144.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)                  2405.8 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   4812.1 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        5699670.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Partial Index              BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   87401364.4   7489.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      17524.5   3186.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      22554.4   5245.2
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    5382685.1   4326.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0    1849908.9   4624.8
Process Creation                                126.0      86373.6   6855.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      23144.0   5458.5
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)                     ---       2405.8      ---
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       4812.1   8020.2
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    5699670.5   3799.8
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)                         5215.7

Same server, with HyperThreading/Logical CPUs ENABLED

Code:
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

   System: localhost.localdomain: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5PAE -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 20 08:16:13 EST 2010
   Machine: i686 (i386)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.6 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 8: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 9: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.6 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 10: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 11: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.6 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 12: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 13: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 14: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   CPU 15: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.6 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization
   11:32:24 up 2 min,  2 users,  load average: 0.09, 0.08, 0.03; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Feb 05 2010 11:32:24 - 11:55:40
16 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       10898006.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2265.2 MWIPS (6.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1836.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              675419.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  84729.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               8720.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   4076.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)                  1370.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2160.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        2759595.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Partial Index              BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   10898006.5    933.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2265.2    411.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1836.7    427.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     675419.8    542.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      84729.4    211.8
Process Creation                                126.0       8720.0    692.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4076.6    961.5
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)                     ---       1370.5      ---
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2160.2   3600.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2759595.6   1839.7
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)                          758.7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Feb 05 2010 11:55:40 - 12:19:15
16 CPUs in system; running 16 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       95169178.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    29861.0 MWIPS (8.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              33699.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             7363181.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                2543525.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                             130941.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  35122.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)                  3302.9 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6429.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        6630712.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Partial Index              BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   95169178.1   8155.0
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      29861.0   5429.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      33699.1   7837.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    7363181.0   5919.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0    2543525.1   6358.8
Process Creation                                126.0     130941.4  10392.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      35122.8   8283.7
Shell Scripts (16 concurrent)                     ---       3302.9      ---
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       6429.4  10715.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    6630712.0   4420.5
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)                         7219.1
~38.4% improvement with HT.

Post yours. Again, please disable disk I/O test. Use the command above.

PS: Thanks to John (JTY) for pointing me towards testing using the 5.1.2 version!

CPU recommendations | Xeon W-2295 vs EPYC 7502P

Hello, i'm about to buy new server and like to know what's the better between those two CPUs , will use this server for shared hosting:
Intel Xeon W-2295 vs AMD EPYC 7502P

Both are same price but never use AND for hosting before so i'm confused what to choose
Than

new server for virtualization

hi i'm looking to buy new dedicated server. my requirement is to create windows vpses.
8 core
64gb ram
1.5tb ssd/nvme disk.

i need 62 additional ips. currently i'm using ovh. but there support is bad. they provide failover ips for onetime payment. thats the only + point. please recomment me a good provider